Monday, March 14, 2011

Do you understand that social security isn't welfare, it's insurance we bought with OUR money....?

Do you understand that buying retirement and disability insurance, is no different than buying dental insurance, or fire insurance or car insurance? Can you not see that we payed for a product, and the government stole the money we gave them to hold for it and now instead of putting it back they just want to lie about it, say it's a "bad thing' , and trick the populace into idiotically going along with that, instead? Can you not see that? I'm really angry They just cut what little income the poorest people in the nation have to struggle to live miserably on, because through no fault of their own, they got sick and disabled but had responsibly bought insurance in case this happened, but now LYING THIEVES just stole some of their money (as if the hyper-rich people need more , do they need more money? do they not have enough? do you believe sick people should forcibly have to give it to them, and just buy kidney beans instead of meat from now on?????
--------------------
Regarding what mbrcatz said, you revealed some artificial bias when you said "democrats" did the money stealing its just not a true statement..both parties greedily grabbed every penny however I truly appreciate you putting in the time and effort to express your view and make it understood like that. I cant accept that the notion of the numbers being impossible (as you described) is anything but that very "lie" that the asker speaks of (ie, the claim that its a faulty system, welfarish, and unfair... the politicians are just passing that around to deflect folks from the truth that they stole our money, and should put it back. the system is NOT broke because "it doesn't take in as much as goes out" (and if it isnt taking enough in, well, raise the rates, that's how insurance works) the system is broke because it got raided the "extra" money that was there surely would have greatly reduced any shortfall occurring as the baby boom starts retiring, and from there as I said, with any type of insurance, you raise the rates responsibly to wherever they need to be i wouldn't put it past the congress to know damn well that by not raising them, it'd create this mess even further -so they did this knowingly, knowing that it would help their scuzzy plans to raid the system,scuttle it, vilify it publicly with lies, then get rid of it -having made a huge profit, and succeeded in vilifying the "other party" so they could get into office in the first place. (they don't care what "issue" they create in peoples minds..like abortion, for example..you think they actually CARE about that? they don't! but they have "thinktanks" where, like a carefully orchestrated chess game, it is figured out what they can say to get the desired effect, and get the job done. thats all this is and its poor bashing too and what could be more unconscionable than that? -to vilify the sickly, to gain support for leaving them entirely derelict in the street that's what all that "ssdi is welfare" and "SO MANY" are "getting it when they could work (no they aren't, its incredibly HARD to get on social security!!! you HAVE TO be bonafide to even get to apply!!~ and then you have to have multiple doctors swearing legally on paper that you're so sick you cant function normally and doctors will NOT falsify paperwork doctors works hard to get to where they are they make good money and they don't want to risk that for nothing so I don't see where all this alleged "welfare fraud" is even POSSIBLE so as for the sick and the old leaching unfairly off those who work, all i can say to that malignant notion is--> What will happen to these "unfairly put upon working people" when THEY retire? its like you said, insurance is about spreading the risk if they didn't happen to get sick, let them thank their god and enjoy their health why would people who have the good life suggest that sick people should be left to what, die? live on the sidewalk?
Source

No comments:

Post a Comment